It is surprising that in a country where there are 80 percent people living with thirty rupees a day and virtually from hand to mouth, there are others like Janardhan Reddy though now in jail, and his brothers who had robbed the state and the country of Rs 5000 crores. Here are some significant details which are shocking. CBI found and even impounded a chair, weighing 15 Kg of gold and so many other household effects of gold of Rs 2.2 crores. Not only that CBI also found other idols of gold worth 2.3 crores and even cash of Rs 3 crores in bags. According to Janardhan Reddey’s own statement his earning from mines per day was Rs 5 crores. It is absolutely shocking as to how could an individual mine and export illegally iron ore worth more that Rs 12 thousand crores and went unnoticed. What to speak of his conviction in 2007 when it comes to be known about his illegal exports. While Reddy brother earned thousands of crores every year, the iron mine workers got hardly enough for two course meals.
Janardhan Reddy lived like princes in a three storey house with a member of expensive cars like Mercedes, well equipped bar, a longer helipad opposite the house and even a helipad in the house as well plus. “Three rings of security around house. Road to the bungalow under CCTV cover from half a km away” Reddy and his brother lived exceptionally luxurious life far a decade or more. Neither the central government nor the state government took action against Reddy brother till recently when CBI arrested him. His brother’s are absconding and not yet arrested. How the poor workers who worked for Reddy brother in the mines lived? They got just the minimum wages. Neither the state government nor the central government bothered about their wellbeing in the ordous jobs as mine workers, because, it is revealed that police, forest officials as well as revenue officials were on Reddys payroll. Why they have not been arrested? It is essential to arrest all criminals whether of police or revenue department so that in future there is no repetition of such a shocking episode in which thousands of crores have been usurped.
Poor mine workers of Bellary had not seen a 100 rupee note till 2009 which hundreds of men who formed Janardhan Reddy’s informal Army were given by Reddy money mobile phone and motorcycles. But the common man and mine worker did not got anything. Condition of poor workers in and mines further suffered when Supreme Court ordered ban on mining in Bellary till same kind of ‘regime’ takes charges of mining. Prior to that for every lorry carrying iron ore three people were employed as driver cleaner and supervisor and for every drilling machine there were 20 lorries which meant employment of four lakh people in the mining district of Bellary. And now because of arrest of Reddy and Supreme Court order there is absolute closure of mines and complete unemployment and consequent more suffering of mine workers and others.
BJP President Advani’s has started another Rathjatra from Bihar. Supported and accompanied by Bihar’s Chief Minister Nitish Kumar. From Bihar Advani plans to continue his Rathjatra all over India in 23 states though it has not been allowed by UP CM Mayawati to enter Azamgarh in UP. It must be said to the credit of 84 years old Advani that he is not only physically fit but is an eloquent speaker with impressive loud voice as well as Hindutva philosophy of RSS cum BJP. No doubt BJP and its president have an eye on 2014 elections and if congress is voted out of power Advani is likely to become Prime Minister once again. Only on 13th Oct 2011 Advani in press conference and TV changed his mind and said that he is no longer interested in being PM. There are other competent BJP senior members who can be thought and selected for the post of PM in 2014 or earlier, if Congress government of UPA falls.
In a country like India which is subcontent having second highest population in the world, after China and is multi linguistic and multi religious and multi cultural, to propagate Hindutva, in the long run can be against communal harmony because of almost absolute dominance in BJP of Hindi language and Hinduism. Particularly in Kerala where more than 50 percent population is Christian and Muslims, in Tamil Nadu the vast majority are Hindus but they speak and write Tamil and a very small percentage of educated Tamils know and speak Hindi. Similarly it is Andhra Pradesh as well as Telengana where agitation for separate state is going on for more than a month have virtually nothing to do with Hindi language. Similarly in Kashmir where 90 percent population is Muslim, the educated population speaks and writes Urdu but virtually no one is concerned with Hindi and Devnagri script. Similarly all the eastern India states like Assam and others are quite opposed to Hindi domination or even use of Hindi language.
However Advani’s Rathjatra has given boost to both Advani and BJP. With the decline of congress under Sonia Gandhi and Manmohan Singh there is rise of BJP and Advani. Advani’s Rathjatra is going to all the 23 states of India including BJP ruled state of South India Karnataka. It is getting good reception everywhere which is enhancing the prospects of BJP coming in power even before 2004 because of congress decline and early fall. Fall of Congress will do good to India for ever because it will mean end of dynastic rule not only at centre but in many states. With the prospect of BJP coming in power before 2004 or even 2004, the hopes of congress coming to power have been dashed. Equally or rather more, important for India is that loss of Congress will herald end of dynastic rule in India and even followed by in many states.
Incompetent Rahul Gandhi was being groomed by Congress and UPA as next PM. Rahul spent his early life, till Sonia Gandhi assumed congress leadership after Rajiv Gandhi assassination, in America enjoying the life and even did not marry. With the continuous decline and ultimate end of congress, Rahul is likely to go back to America.
All the above changes that are likely to be because of rise of BJP and Advani’s Rathjatra all over India. At 84 or 85 Advani may be happy that he had unexpectedly good times, becoming PM and then being leader of opposition for eight years and now having a second Rathjatra . No other political leader of any political party including Congress had such Rathjatra or idea of such Rathjatra. Thus Advani may be known and remembered so long as BJP is in power as the leader who popularized Rathjatra and enhanced BJP’s following all over India like BJP’s founder President Vajpae
Government of India’s Finance Minister, P Chidambaram was associated with A Raja then Telecom minister from early 2006. When a number of ministers including Chidambaram as a member for telecom policy of government, particularly spectrum prices: A few days later, Dayanidhi Maran (now in jail for masterminding Telecom scam) submitted to PM revised note on spectrum prices. A year later Finance secretary too wrote to Deptt of Telecom for inclusion of spectrum prices in terms of reference. A few months later in 2007 finance secretary wrote to cabinet secretary to resolve the problem of spectrum prices. Cabinet Secretary left the matter to be resolved by finance secretary and telecom secretary. In the meantime PM asks A Raja who continued with the policy of first come first served but infact always used his discretion to award spectrum licenses to men and firms of his choice. In these days there was regular correspondence between A Raja and PM. Though Chidambaram was finance secretary, he remained a silent spectator or his consent was taken for granted.
Deptt of economic affairs questioned as to why spectrums were being auctioned at 2001 prices. After informing finance minister Chidambaram, Deptt of Economic affairs suggested that spectrum be auctioned after revising the 2001 prevailing fee. It is surprising that Chidambaram even then did not take any direct action.
Chidambaram was not only ineffective finance minister but when he became Home minister and there were terrorist attack on Delhi High court and earlier, he proved equally to be in effective. In the meantime there was hostility between Chidambaram and Finance Minister Pranab Mukherji who openly said downgrading Chidambaram that “a number of stories on 2G spectrum had appeared in the media in journey 2011” Chidambaram was very much disturbed, as it is said he must have spent sleepless nights in view of note from finance ministry on March 25, 2011 to PM accusing Chidambaram for his note in 2G spectrum scam. The next day Mukherji met the Supreme Court which was hearing on 2G scam because of Subramanian Swamy’s petition Chidambaram immediately contacted the PM and offered to quiet from the government as home minister. But PM, to save his governments prestige persuaded Chidambaram not to press for his resignation.
How long Chidambaram can face insult after insult heaped on him by his hostile and even inimical finance minister Mukherjee? Mukherjee’s note had said that Chidambaram had written to the Prime Minister in January 2008 recommending auction of spectrum but had meant only new spectrum. BJP leader Arun Jaitley immediately took political advantage of the attack by Mukherjee and inability to challenge it by Chidambaram. Arun Jaitley concluded “the March 25 note makes a factual recording of all that happened. It records all the various factors at play and other documents and says this loss (of lakhs of crores of rupees) could have been prevented” Sushma Swaraj, BJP leader in the Lok Sabha said” Prime Ministers support to Chidambaram could not be based either on facts or on merits of 2G controversy.” Thus Chidambaram is going to face storm in Parliament as well as in Supreme Court. Though PM has persuaded him time and again not to resign but Chidambaram has finally decided that he will not contest 2004 elections and virtually quite. However Chidambaram has to appear before Supreme Court and explain his conduct in 2G scam in association with A Raja.
Inclusion of the upper caste Muslims in Ninth Schedule of constitute for Quota – Demand by UPCM Mayawati – Whether it is justified?
In India after independence concession and reservation for SC’s were grated only for 20 years in the hope that there will be improvement in their income and livelihood and as such there would be no need for reservation and grant of special benefits to scheduled castes after 1972. But unfortunately no serious efforts were made under Pandit Nehru’s Regime to end poverty of lower classes and bring equality of all Indian citizens. Accordingly originally to uplift the scheduled castes and even other backward classes, which was not foreseen in 1952, there has been steady increase in reservation or quota which is today 50%, still in a letter to PM Manmohan Singh, Mayawati has pressed on 10th Sept 2011 to include upper caste Muslims living below poverty line in the ninth schedule of the constitution so that, Mayawati stressed, this latest inclusion on her demand “is not legally challenged”.
UP Chief Minister’s demand in vote bank politics as election in UP and quite close in 2012. It is noteworthy that even senior leaders of Muslims belonging to All India Muslim Law Board have challenged Mayawati’s seriousness to help Muslims. Kamal Faruqui of law board member has said “Had she (Mayawati) been really serious about it she would have passed a resolution first” Thus Faruqui Predicted that centre to obviously see through it, and they are unlikely to take it seriously. Muslims supported her last time and got nothing in return _ _ _ _ vast funds have remained unspent in Muslim Majority destructs”.
If even senior leaders of Muslim organisation have called Mayawati’s demand of quota for Muslims, It is rightly considered as just for “reaping poll harvest “and have therefore opposed it. How can Mayawati’s plea to PM to include Muslims quota be taken seriously either by Muslims or central government? Even Mayawati’s party BSP’s Muslim leader Ahmed Hussan has accused CM of not fulfilling the promise to Muslims made by her in July 2007 in a meeting with Muslim Ulema. All India Muslim personal Law Board members Jilani has clarified Muslim stand on reservations saying “ some Muslim Communities have been included in the Backward Class (OBC’s) category list in UP for reservation benefit” It is noteworthy that when Muslim leaders of UP and Muslims MLA of her own party have opposed Mayawati’s request to PM, of her own party have opposed Mayawati’s request to PM, but stressed on the implementation of existing OBC category Muslims to get their due urgently which Mayawati had ignored since 2007.
Constitution of India had ordained that there should be no reservation or quota even for SC’s after 20 years i.e. after 1972. Instead after 64 years of independence there has been vast increase in quota which is now 50%. Therefore PM and Central Government have rightly ignored Mayawati’s request to PM and central government have rightly ignored Mayawati’s request to PM in a long letter. It is high time that central government determines to improve the lot of poor and backward castes so that there is no demand at all like Mayawati’s which infact reflected vote bank polities which is a curse and is unfortunately prevalent in all political parties of India without any exception.
Pakistan supplied nuclear technology to China – Revelations by A.Q Khan – Pakistan Relation at Lowest.
Already US- Pak relations have been strained to the breaking point. The latest exposure by A Q Khan Pakistan topmost nuclear sciencetists for decades, rather nuclear architect, to Hendson who is custodian of many secrets of Khan for many years will finally break US-Pak relations. Khan’s supplying nuclear secrets and even nuclear weapons to china was revealed to Hendson because of insurance against harassment or even worse by Pakistan government. Khan has even implicated Pakistan Army and the Chinese government in the proli feration of nuclear technology and weapons between Pakistan and China. For almost a decade Khan and Pakistan government were having close relations with Chinese government and Chinese minister who were often coming to Pakistan and staying there for weeks to learn nuclear technology and knowhow so that they can manufacture nuclear weapons in China and are able to use these weapons without Pakistan’s help.
In his letter to his wife Henny in December 2003 Khan tells her all the secrets in very strong words saying so that Pakistan government does not play a mischief with me tell them “the bastards” first used us and new playing dirty games with us Khan asked his wife to contact British Journalist Simon Henderson his confidant for many years. It is apt to produce details about Pakistan-China cooperation for nuclear technology and nuclear weapon. Khan’s letter to his wife makes it clear. “You know we had cooperative with China for 15 years (prior to 2003) we put up a centrifuge plant. We sent 135C -130 plane loads of machines, inverters, valves, flow, meters, pressure gauges. Our team stayed there for weeks to help and their teams stayed here for weeks at a time. Late minister Li Chew, VM (Vice-Minister
) Li Chew vice vice minister Jiang Shangfie used to visit us? How can America which considered till recently Pakistan a close ally, tolerate all this. It is thus natural that US- Pakistan relations, if not already broken, are at breaking point.
After getting so much nuclear technology and weapons, China, to maintain good relations with Pakistan reciprocated, as Khan also reveals. The Chinese gave us the drawings of nuclear weapons, gave us kg 50 enriches, uranium, gave us 10 tons UP6 (natural) and 5 tons of UFS (3%) Chinese helped PAEC (Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission) the rival organisation to the Khan Research Laboratories in setting of UF6 plant production reactor for plutonium and reprocessing plant’
Inspite of USA’s insistence that Pakistan should by all means controls and even eliminate terrorism from everywhere from NWFP and Baluchistan in particular, Pakistan has made it clear that it will not attack Haqqani extremists. Washington has accused Pakistan of ISI involvement in the Sept 13, 2011 attack on US embassy in Kabul.
In view of revelation by A Q Khan and recent attack on US embassy in Kabul, there seems to be no possibility of improvement of US-Pak relations but in fact further deterioration Present Obama refused to meet Pakistan delegation at recent UN Assembly meeting. Last week Admiral Mike told the US senate that “Pakistan has committed act of war against the US”. He also called Haqqani network a veritable arm of Pakistan’s intelligence the ISI. Thus there is going to be further deterioration or even caplete breakup US-Pak relations. India should, therefore, deal with Pakistan carefully as India USA are now fast friends.
For almost a week, all Newspapers and Media carried the news of possibility of terrorist attack in USA and India. Both the countries took serious steps to tighten their security. USA cannot forgive and forget the terrorist attack on twin tower that resulted in the destruction of tower and death of many hundred innocent citizens. Reason for terrorist attack in USA is because of American intervention in Afghanistan with Army, tanks and plane to kill the Taliban of Afghanistan. Immediately American army started bombing some known and other unknown hide-outs of Taliban, particularly in the tribal area of Afghanistan. This infuriated Osama Bin Laden the so called apostle of Taliban and his followers who made up the mind to hit back by master minding attack on twin tower in New York and they succeeded and many American citizens persisted thus US President determined to take revenge by virtually occupying Afghanistan and after couple of years George Washington for no reason attacked Iraq thinking that Iraq was preparing and manufacturing nuclear bombs; which was not a fact American intervention and attack with bombs and missiles by US Army has continued since then. It is worthwhile to mention that Taliban was American creation so as to end Russian occupation of Afghanistan. But when US mission to expel Russia from Afghanistan ended America tried finishing militant Talibans and establishing pro-American rule in Afghanistan.
Why there have been repeated terrorist attacks in India particularly outside High Court of Delhi, besides terrible attacks in Maharastra on train killing hundred of innocent passengers? There are so many types of Jehadis in India, originally sponsored by Osama Bin Laden, who has been killed by Americans in his hideouts close to Islamabad in Pakistan. Pakistan had been sponsoring, arming and sending Talibans originally Pathans of NWFP across Kashmir to capture it and thereafter crossing the ceasefire line of Kashmir Valley and Jammu with India from remaining part of Kashmir with Pakistan (POK). Though present Chief Minister of Kashmir, Omar Abdullah his father and grand father have always been supporting India’s central government getting financial and military assistance to fight intruder Taliban and other terrorist from Pakistan.
Pakistan has been in turmoil since its independence and has been raising Kashmir question with India and even in UN besides sending Jehadis to cross the ceasefire line and kill Kashmir’s who are pro-India. As these Jehadis could not succeed in Kashmir they have been financing, training and sending to Kashmir. Bombay and Delhi since then because India is a soft state and UPA government did not give capital punishment to any Jehadi even those caught and jailed. Even Afzal Guru who was duly sentenced to death since long by the Supreme Court has not been hanged till now though it is likely that Afzal Guru and a few more may be hanged in near future. If that is done, India Mujahdins will or likely to cease attacks in Delhi and in other parts of India.
Home Minister P. Chidambaram should have taken steps to update and strengthen security not only around Delhi High court but all over capital. Had he done so there would not been attack on High Court of Delhi on Sept 7 killing a dozen and injuring 80 and naturally there would have been no further threat of repetitive of terrorist attack on High court or anywhere. Manmohan Singh as PM should have personally seen that security has been tightened instead of just visiting the injured in hospital after the attack.
There would have been no fear of repetition of 9/11 attack on Twin Tower in New York had American forces been withdrawn from Afghanistan and no attack on Iraq. America would have saved tens of trillion dollars and there would not have been any recession or debt crisis in USA which has caused recession in Europe and Asia virtually whole world. It is high time that Obama learn lesson from the blunders of George Bush and withdraws US troops not only from Afghanistan but also from Iraq.
To sum it up during last 64 years of independence India has not systematically improved its intelligence and police services with latest equipment and
training of security personnel: That is why there had been attacks on Indian territory first by China in 1962 and later on to this day attacks by Pakistan Army, Intelligence services and Terrorists sponsored, armed and trained by Pakistan: That is why India is continuously getting terrorist attacks mainly because Indian governments have been weak and relying on vote bank politics and not hanging many terrorist like Afzal Guru.
USA and India have become close friends in order to fight Terrorist Organisation of Pakistan like IM, LeT, JeM and HuJi
It is most significant and important that US Secretary of state Hillary Clinton on 15th Sept 2011 designated the Indian Mujahideen (IM) as a Foreign Terrorist organisation with links with Pakistan. Hillary Clinton designated the Indian Mujahideen as a Foreign Terrorist organisation (FTO) under section 219 of the immigration and nationality Act and a specially designated Global Terrorist under section 1(b) of Executive order 13224 US state department, clearly and definitely created terrorist group like IM, LeT, JeM and HuJi having significant links with Pakistan” IM in particular has been named as having close ties to other US designated terrorist organisation. States department also confirmed to the satisfaction of India that IM played a “facilitative role in 2008 Mumbai attack carried out by LeT that killed 163 people including six Americans.”
From the above serious and strong comments by US Secy of State and US State Deptt it becomes absolutely clear that US government and people are no longer indifferent to Jehadis attacks by IM and other terrorist organisation financed and supported by Pakistan, directly or indirectly by the Pakistan government which has caused havoc in India, latest being attack on Delhi High Court on 7th September. Thus it is formal acknowledgement of US secretary of state and state Deptt that these designations (of terrorist organisation supported by Pakistan) highlight the threat of posed by Indian Mujahideen not only to western interest but to India, a close US partner”.
It is the first time in Indo-US history that India and USA have become “close partners” because Indian populace has borne the brunt of IM’S wanton violence and today actions illustrate our solidarity with the Indian government. This statement is heartening to Indian people and government was made by Daniel Benjamin, the Deptt of states coordinator for counter terrorism.
So for India has been suffering by terrorist supported by Pakistan. US has anti terrorist organisation to monitor and control and prevent terrorist activities in their country so that there is no repetition of 9/11 attack on twin towers in Washington or elsewhere in USA. Similarly India must have anti terrorist organisation with latest equipment and best intelligence, so that hereafter, there is no terrorist attack like that on Delhi High Court by IM or any other terrorist group financed by Pakistan with arms and intelligence. Thus anti terrorist organisation of India when it is farmed and headed by intelligence officers will even prevent any attack by Pakistan’s terrorist in Jammu and Kashmir, as has been going on since independence and no repetition of 26/11 attack on Mumbai.
For US-India friendship, some credit must go to PM Manmohan Singh who had visited USA and met President Obama many times and even US secretaries, UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi, Foreign Minister Krishna or any other minister who visited USA had such a reception or such exchange of news. Though Manmohan Singh has been considered as weakest PM ever, but in this respect, for strengthening Indo-US relations, his contribution can not be ignored. In this respect Home Minister Chidambaram or Mukerjee or Antony had no contribution at all though they are quite close to Sonia Gandhi.
Latest news is that US President Obama has refused to meet Pakistan PM Yousuf Gilani. As a result Pakistan PM has called off his visit to attend UN General Assembly Session.
What business or right Britain has to debate on human rights violation in British House of Commons on Indian Kashmir when the whole world knows that violation of human rights in Pakistan, which is epicentre of terror, at its height. There are daily suicides bombing attack on innocent in Pakistan and in relation Pakistan Army’s conflict or retaliation in which are almost daily. It seems that British conservative and indirectly British government which allows such a debate is guilty of violation of India’s sovereignty. Just to please Pakistan Muslims who are British citizens in great number and to get their votes. It is surprising that British Foreign and Commonwealth officials have commented that “British Parliament is entitled to debate”. Has Indian Parliament debated on Human rights violation in UK during the August 2011 riots in which many lost their lives and many houses, shops were burnt and looted? British Indian’s particularly British Sikhs prevented the riot from spreading and showed on video the happenings and atrocities, British public. Even the British PM Cameron praised the UK Indians for their efforts to maintain peace.
Whole of the world knows including USA and its President Obama that Pakistan is hub of terrorism that is why USA has been attacking Pakistan’s NWFP and Baluchistan with Drone attack for years. But British Parliament instead of debating human rights violence in Pakistan has chosen to debate on human rights violation in India’s Kashmir. Whenever there is intrusion of Pakistan terrorist in Kashmir, since Pakistan origin, India has to use its Armed forces to curb such aggression and luckily Indian Kashmir is comparatively free from terrorists today.
As in India, in Indian Kashmir there is working democracy. In Kashmir, too, unlike in Pakistan, there has been never dictatorship from the day Kashmir acceded to India on the pleading of Sheikh Abdullah in 1947 when Pakistan sponsored, trained, armed and financed terrorist from NWFP were sent to Kashmir for illegal occupation and terrorist activities.
Even on 14th September 2011, American Ambassador in Afghanistan said that “Pakistan based Haggane’s network appeared to be responsible for an hour long assault against US embassy in Kabul and nearby Nato Bases” Even China has charged Pakistan for sponsoring and arming terrorist in the China border town of Kashgarh, Pakistan being the source of arms and training the terrorist to the terrorist operating in this region. To allay the security concerns in the area of China, Pakistan has sent six delegations including those led by President Zardari in the short span of a month three more Pakistani teams led by Bilal Bhutto, President Zardari’s son visited china during last few weeks to pacify Chinese government.
It should be clear to British Parliament which country is sponsoring terrorism. Pakistan as is well known has been sponsoring terrorism in India Kashmir and not India. British PM should ban the proposed discussion so as to be just and honest and also to have good relations with British Indians as well as government and India. India has already conveyed to the British government that the proposed debate “will not be helpful” India has rightly emphasized that “India is the world’s largest functional democracy”, Though British government information office has expressed the view that the deliberation in House of Commons will be an expression of the House” these would be “non binding on the British government. But that is not enough. If House of Commons wants to discuss it should have detailed deliberations on Pakistan as hub of terrorism.
While British conservatives are targeting India, US
Secy of states Hillary Clinton and US government have on 15-9-11 openly targeted Pakistan. A statement by state government in Washington said that Indian Mujahdins “maintain close links to Pakistan based Lakshar-e-Taiba (Let) Jaish e Mohammad JEM and Harkat-e-Jihad (HEJC)” British conservatives and British government should note that and take steps that such anti India discussions do not take place in British House of Commons, in future .
His Majesty’s Opponent- Subhas Chandra Bose and India’s Struggle against Empire by Sugata Bose – Brief Book Review.
Netaji Bose’s fight and suffering for India’s independence, if not more, was no less than that of Mahatma Gandhi or any other leader who gave his everything, including life, for India’s Freedom from British rule. The Book under review gives minute details from his childhood, studies in Cambridge University, selection in ICS, the most coveted service in early 20th century, his resignation at the age of 24 only on and joining of independence movement his election as President of Indian National Congress and his resignation manipulated and forced by Mahatma Gandhi when he got elected second time in 1939 his imprisonment in India, his going abroad to Germany and then to Japan, to fight against British Empire for freedom of India through INA in Singapore and ultimate hidden cause of his demise and his rehabilitation.
India’s greatest freedom fighter – Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose never supported the British whether in India, in Cambridge and London or in any other European country that he visited a number of times and delivered fiery speeches against British imperialism and British atrocities in India. Subhas was unlike Gandhi who had supported British till the end of 1st World War and even recruited soldiers for British imperialist and was called by Annie Besant, a true freedom fighter first in Britain then in India as British sergeant though for the sake of Indian’s independence she joined Independence movement led by the Mahatma Gandhi’s non violence struggle for independence of India. She was and remained true soldier of India’s Freedom struggle till 1939.
When Subhas Bose was elected president of Indian National Congress in 1938. His inaugural address was in the words of learned author of the Book, most important, “most detailed political speech that he would ever deliver in India”. In this speech Subhas Bose challenged the British imperialists to transfer their Empire into “federation of nation” and that policy of divide and rule was by no means blessing for the ruling power.” Bose further mentioned about evil intentions of British that they would seek some other constitutional device for partitioning India and there by neutralising the transfer of power to Indian people” Subhas Bose’s inaugural address was supported by all Indians including Gandhiji, Nehru and Sardar Patel, the most prominent leaders of Indian independence struggle in 1938.
Subhas Bose’s reelection as Congress President in 1939 defeating Gandhiji’s choice Sitaramya was considered by Gandhi as his personal defeat and Sadar Patel responded saying that Subhas “reelection is held to be harmful to country’s cause” but that great poet Tagore hereafter supported Bose, the “rebel” president of Congress. “In the words of learned author of the Book” for the next year and half Tagore would continue to be a rock of support during his travel” Subhas Bose who had resigned as Congress President in view of Gandhi – Patel and other Congressmen’s opposition so as to keep the congress independence movement under4 Gandhiji, in the words of author “enjoyed the brief respite from Congress politics in the idyllic setting of Tagore’s university” Tagore gave Subhas the title of “Deshnayak” leader of the country.
Subhas Bose resisted being expelled from Congress that he had served since 1921. Regarding disciplinary action against him by Congress High Commission Bose wrote on August 19, 1934 as a true congressman and freedom fighter that “shall cling to congress even with greater devotion than before and shall go on serving the congress and the country as a servant of the nation”. The learned author’s remark on this historic event is noteworthy though disciplinary action had been taken against him just over a month before. Subhas Chandra Bose was specially invited to attend congress working committee meeting at Wardha. He urged the Congress to launch a mass movement to wrest India’s freedom from Britain. But the congress leadership was not ready to do this” Such vast differences led Subhas Chandra Bose to fight foe Independence with help of Germany and Japan, then enemies of Britain. So Subhas Bose or Netaji went to Japan to fight for India’s independence with the armed struggle through Indian National Army INA. It must go to the credit of Subhas Bose that he forged absolute unity between Hindu Muslim and Sikh in his INA. With the defeat of Axis power – Germany and Japan in 1945, INA, too, got defeated and Subhas Bose, too. But while the Muslim soldier of INA who came to Pakistan were included in Pakistan army while Indian were made prisoners till India’s independence but were not included in the Indian Army as Nehru was “under the influence of Lord and Lady Mountbatten”.
It is said that had Subhas Bose been leader of India after independence there would not have been partition riots in which more than a million innocent Hindus and Sikhs and Muslims perished. Habibur Rahman who was Netaji’s companion in final plane journey from Taipei to Tokyo carrying Netaji’s ashes wrote in 1946, “How much we wish that he had come alive, in that case it is more than certain that he would have occupied a dominant position in India politics” and relation between India and Pakistan would have been “cordial rather than embittered”.